Lucian79 Posted January 5, 2006 Share Posted January 5, 2006 Oricum, daca te ajunge la vreo 11.000 Euro per final leasing+dobanda e mai mult decat OK, pentru ca o Nubira e la banii astia, iar lacetti este clar o evolutie. E chiar super ok ... eu ajung cu kalosu la sfarsit de leasing pe la 10.500 euro, in conditiile in care am luat-o cu un an vechime ..deci nu noua Link to comment
Tommy Posted January 5, 2006 Share Posted January 5, 2006 (edited) taxa vamala in jur de 600, tva-ul e in jur de 2500, plus dobanda in jur de 1000... in total sare de 13 (de fapt ajunge la 14 mii in leasing fara casco) cum iese 11000 eu tot nu inteleg Edited January 5, 2006 by Tommy Link to comment
Mircea Posted January 5, 2006 Share Posted January 5, 2006 masina a fost 9960CIP, pentru ca a avut culoare metalizata. am platit avansul 50% (6100 Euro) si rata este de 130Euro pe 3 ani,casco l-am platit pe un an...adica 624 euro. este varianta in 4 usi 130 euro*1.19*36 luni =5.569.2 euro+6100 euro avansul= 11.669.2 Euro Fara Casco, pentru ca ala il faci la orice masina. Daca vrei sa adaugi si casco pe 3 ani ar fi in jur de 1872 Euro (fara reducerile de neeveniment practicate de la an la an), deci te duce la 13.541.2 Euro. Lamurit? Link to comment
Mircea Posted January 5, 2006 Share Posted January 5, 2006 Nu, doar nitica matematica Link to comment
Tommy Posted January 5, 2006 Share Posted January 5, 2006 (edited) uite ce mi-au dat cei de la di-bas.. de asta l-am intrebat si de reziduala la o adica e greseala lor later edit: va puteti juca cu cifrele pentru diverse calcule calculator_rate_Di_Bas__9.rar Edited January 5, 2006 by Tommy Link to comment
andreib Posted January 5, 2006 Share Posted January 5, 2006 Ati uitat ca TVA-ul este dedus pe firma si nu este trecut in calcule. 1894 de eur este numai TVA-ul . Link to comment
Tommy Posted January 5, 2006 Share Posted January 5, 2006 pai.. dedus nededus il platesti , am scris mai sus.. 2500 tva-ul dar vezi in calculatorul de la di-bas ca rata iese 161 fara tva, nu 130, dar ma rog Link to comment
Immortal Posted January 18, 2006 Share Posted January 18, 2006 (edited) Nu, doar nitica matematica Extrem de gresita. Daca avansu' e de 50%, restu' n-ar trebui sa fie...50% + dobanda? j/k Edited January 18, 2006 by Immortal Link to comment
razvanclub1 Posted January 18, 2006 Author Share Posted January 18, 2006 (edited) daca avansul este 50% restul nu este 50%+dobanda pt ca in avans mai intra si taxa de inmatriculare,comsioanele...etc am facut un calcul 380 de km din care doar 50 in bucuresti si mi-a iesit un consum de 8,15% Edited January 19, 2006 by Satori Link to comment
Immortal Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 (edited) In alta ordine de idei, dobanda e mai mare decat taxa inmatriculare + comision, deci still...al doilea 50% e mai mare decat primu' (in teorie, dar si in practica). Edited January 19, 2006 by Satori Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now